|
Hi there, DP. :). So, the first link you posted for AFC.OC, that's my RE. And he explains AMH exactly as it is reported on the clinic's page. When I first tested there, he did say that he considers anything 1.0 and over to be good. My best was .92, which he wasn't that worried about. Problem was that when you look at my other factors, FSH/AFC, the picture became more clear. Yes, there's uncertainty around AMH values, but it shouldn't be considered in a vacuum. AMH alone isn't enough to predict your chances of responding well and having a successful cycle. And truly, the bottom line is that you just don't know til you try. Even when my AMH didn't totally suck, I didn't respond well and was cancelled twice. The proof is in the pudding, as they say.
|